Tag Archives: Boston Bruins

Updating the Rankings

The team rankings can change with every NHL game played. The data is based on the “Point Shares” that a player earns in games. If you want more info on the methodology, it’s all here: https://www.draft-analysis.com/

The last time I ran the data was three years ago. A lot has changed and we also now have enough data to analyze a couple more drafts. It takes time for drafted players to get to the NHL, so I previously stopped at 2017. This time, I ran up through 2020. The more recent drafts are a lot more volatile and will likely change a lot more as the players earn Point Shares through their career.

A lot of what is done here is to look at drafts objectively, with data, largely because I’m a Bruins fan and Bruins fans love to say “Don Sweeney is the worst GM for drafting.” I wanted to see if that is correct, using data. I’ll give you the short version here, since 2015 and through the 2020 draft, the Bruins have been the 13th best in the NHL. So like I tell people, definitely not the worst, not the best, but in the top half. There’s also a lot of fluctuations in how they’ve drafted. I did rank each team each year and this is what we got:
2015: 27th best
2016: 6th best
2017: 2nd best
2018: 11th best
2019: 28th best
2020: First overall

And before you guffaw at that 2020, two caveats:
1. It’s about value for their draft position. It’s not about getting just the best player, it’s getting the best player at each of their draft positions, or what I call “avoiding missed value”.
2. It’s the most recent draft that I’ve looked at and the numbers are extremely close through all the teams. The numbers for 2020 will change a lot over the next 10+ years.

The 2015 Draft

Bruins fans love to call out 2015 for the Bruins as it was a huge missed opportunity. The Bruins could have gotten much better players. But for what this looks at, avoiding missed value, the Bruins didn’t do the worst, they even had three teams who did worse. Here’s the 2015 draft rankings. The second column is the total “missed value” and the last column is the average. The Bruins have the most aggregate missed value but they also had more draft picks than other teams.

Rank	Team	Total Missed Value	Missed Value Per Pick
1	Edmonton Oilers	-83	-13.83
2	Calgary Flames	-92.8	-18.56
3	Minnesota Wild	-154.7	-22.10
4	Pittsburgh Penguins	-98.1	-24.53
5	Nashville Predators	-186.7	-26.67
6	Vancouver Canucks	-200.7	-28.67
7	Winnipeg Jets	-235.3	-29.41
8	Carolina Hurricanes	-265.9	-29.54
9	St. Louis Blues	-190.4	-31.73
10	Los Angeles Kings	-192.3	-32.05
11	Chicago Blackhawks	-224.8	-32.11
12	New York Islanders	-225.1	-32.16
13	Washington Capitals	-133.3	-33.33
14	Buffalo Sabres	-202.10	-33.68
15	Florida Panthers	-270.4	-33.80
16	Colorado Avalanche	-243	-34.71
17	Columbus Blue Jackets	-313.4	-34.82
18	New Jersey Devils	-183.1	-36.62
19	Detroit Red Wings	-221.3	-36.88
20	Montreal Canadiens	-191.1	-38.22
21	Dallas Stars	-192.5	-38.50
22	Philadelphia Flyers	-347.7	-38.63
23	Ottawa Senators	-309.5	-38.69
24	Anaheim Ducks	-271.6	-38.80
25	San Jose Sharks	-357.8	-39.76
26	Toronto Maple Leafs	-360	-40.00
27	Boston Bruins	-401.4	-40.14
28	Arizona Coyotes	-387.1	-43.01
29	Tampa Bay Lightning	-357.2	-44.65
30	New York Rangers	-314.3	-44.90

Let’s keep going.

2016 Draft

The Bruins were sixth best in 2016, helped by Charlie McAvoy. He is currently the 3rd best player in that draft and the Bruins got him 14th. Minnesota is in the lead currently more by default and bigger misses by other teams. The Wild had four picks and got Kunin and Duhaime to the NHL. What’s also an illustration of this methodology is Toronto had the first overall pick and landed a generational player in Matthews. But that doesn’t get them to the top of this list. They, like many other teams, missed on players like Alex Debrincat, Adam Fox, Brandon Hagel and Jesper Bratt.

1	Minnesota Wild	-85.6	-21.40
2	New York Rangers	-134.5	-22.42
3	Arizona Coyotes	-113.5	-22.70
4	New York Islanders	-142.5	-23.75
5	Calgary Flames	-233.4	-25.93
6	Boston Bruins	-166.5	-27.75
7	Montreal Canadiens	-166.5	-27.75
8	San Jose Sharks	-141.2	-28.24
9	Nashville Predators	-229.1	-28.64
10	Tampa Bay Lightning	-310.5	-31.05
11	Detroit Red Wings	-220.1	-31.44
12	Washington Capitals	-223.2	-31.89
13	Chicago Blackhawks	-288.4	-32.04
14	Philadelphia Flyers	-325.2	-32.52
15	Los Angeles Kings	-132.1	-33.03
16	Buffalo Sabres	-332.8	-33.28
17	St. Louis Blues	-233.9	-33.41
18	Toronto Maple Leafs	-369.7	-33.61
19	Florida Panthers	-237.4	-33.91
20	New Jersey Devils	-311.7	-34.63
21	Vancouver Canucks	-211.5	-35.25
22	Pittsburgh Penguins	-216.8	-36.13
23	Columbus Blue Jackets	-181.5	-36.30
24	Anaheim Ducks	-218.1	-36.35
25	Dallas Stars	-228.6	-38.10
26	Colorado Avalanche	-231.9	-38.65
27	Ottawa Senators	-200.6	-40.12
28	Winnipeg Jets	-241.4	-40.23
29	Carolina Hurricanes	-372.3	-41.37
30	Edmonton Oilers	-381.6	-42.40

2017 Draft

The Bruins had a big jump in the rankings for this draft on the back of Jeremy Swayman, huge value in the 4th round. Dallas easily won this draft as they got the 2nd, 5th and 6th best players using the 3rd, 39th and 26th picks to do that for Miro Heiskenen, Jason Robertson and Jake Oettinger. That’s how you draft value and that’s what this analysis is all about. The current best player from this draft was taken 4th, by Colorado, Cale Makar. The Devils might be happy with their pick, Hischier, but I’m willing to bet that Philadelphia would love a do-over after their pick of Nolan Patrick at 2.

1	Dallas Stars	-69.6	-9.94
2	Boston Bruins	-77.9	-11.13
3	Columbus Blue Jackets	-84	-12.00
4	San Jose Sharks	-82.9	-13.82
5	St. Louis Blues	-83.5	-13.92
6	New York Islanders	-70.7	-14.14
7	Calgary Flames	-70.8	-14.16
8	Pittsburgh Penguins	-85.7	-14.28
9	Edmonton Oilers	-103.5	-14.79
10	New York Rangers	-104.1	-14.87
11	New Jersey Devils	-172.1	-15.65
12	Tampa Bay Lightning	-95.5	-15.92
13	Toronto Maple Leafs	-111.5	-15.93
14	Minnesota Wild	-97.6	-16.27
15	Colorado Avalanche	-114.4	-16.34
16	Winnipeg Jets	-133	-16.63
17	Nashville Predators	-101.9	-16.98
18	Ottawa Senators	-71.6	-17.90
19	Vancouver Canucks	-148.6	-18.58
20	Carolina Hurricanes	-151	-18.88
21	Los Angeles Kings	-135	-19.29
22	Vegas Golden Knights	-236.2	-19.68
23	Florida Panthers	-99.2	-19.84
24	Chicago Blackhawks	-179.7	-19.97
25	Anaheim Ducks	-102	-20.40
26	Washington Capitals	-41.7	-20.40
27	Buffalo Sabres	-128.6	-21.43
28	Detroit Red Wings	-249.6	-22.69
29	Montreal Canadiens	-161	-23.00
30	Arizona Coyotes	-199.4	-24.93
31	Philadelphia Flyers	-236.3	-26.26

2018 Draft

This is the first time looking at this draft and those coming after it. The players have now had six years to reach the NHL and start earning their point shares. We are already starting to get into some really narrow margins in the rankings, a lot can still change in the future. And with the Bruins currently only having Jakub Lauko playing in the NHL, they’ll likely drop in future years. Edmonton leads this draft on the back of having taken Evan Bouchard with the 10th overall pick. Buffalo took Rasmus Dahlin first overall, but the best player taken was Quinn Hughes by Vancouver at 7.

1	Edmonton Oilers	-28.4	-5.68
2	Toronto Maple Leafs	-65.1	-7.23
3	Winnipeg Jets	-48	-8.00
4	Tampa Bay Lightning	-57.4	-8.20
5	New Jersey Devils	-49.6	-8.27
6	Vancouver Canucks	-49.7	-8.28
7	Vegas Golden Knights	-70.9	-8.86
8	St. Louis Blues	-53.9	-8.98
9	Calgary Flames	-46.1	-9.22
10	Nashville Predators	-39.1	-9.78
11	Boston Bruins	-49.1	-9.82
12	Columbus Blue Jackets	-59.5	-9.92
13	Minnesota Wild	-79.5	-9.94
14	Florida Panthers	-60.7	-10.12
15	Philadelphia Flyers	-82.6	-10.33
16	Carolina Hurricanes	-62.2	-10.37
17	Washington Capitals	-74.3	-10.61
18	Ottawa Senators	-85.2	-10.65
19	Anaheim Ducks	-75.9	-10.84
20	Buffalo Sabres	-65.5	-10.92
21	Pittsburgh Penguins	-46.1	-11.53
22	San Jose Sharks	-105.8	-11.76
23	Colorado Avalanche	-95.5	-11.94
24	Los Angeles Kings	-86.3	-12.33
25	Dallas Stars	-105.1	-13.14
26	New York Rangers	-133.9	-13.39
27	New York Islanders	-109.7	-13.71
28	Chicago Blackhawks	-110	-13.75
29	Arizona Coyotes	-126.7	-14.08
30	Montreal Canadiens	-160.7	-14.61
31	Detroit Red Wings	-167.6	-16.76

2019 Draft

Another new addition. Bruins only have Johnny Beecher from this one. Only about half the time does the best player go first overall. This is one of them where Jack Hughes is the best player in the draft. The next best players are Moritz Seider, taken 6th by Detroit, Matt Boldy at 12 by Minnesota, Cole Caufield 15th by Montreal and Bowen Byram, 4th by Colorado.

Rank	Team	Missed Value	Missed Value Per Pick
1	Columbus Blue Jackets	-13	-4.33
2	Dallas Stars	-18.6	-4.65
3	Washington Capitals	-21.3	-5.33
4	Montreal Canadiens	-59.9	-5.99
5	Vancouver Canucks	-55.4	-6.16
6	St. Louis Blues	-31.7	-6.34
7	Nashville Predators	-52.1	-6.51
8	Toronto Maple Leafs	-39.4	-6.57
9	New York Islanders	-41	-6.83
10	Minnesota Wild	-54.9	-6.86
11	Anaheim Ducks	-48.4	-6.91
12	Calgary Flames	-35	-7.00
13	Carolina Hurricanes	-84	-7.00
14	Vegas Golden Knights	-56	-7.00
15	Chicago Blackhawks	-42.6	-7.10
16	Philadelphia Flyers	-50.9	-7.27
17	Florida Panthers	-65.5	-7.28
18	New Jersey Devils	-73.1	-7.31
19	Colorado Avalanche	-59.4	-7.43
20	Detroit Red Wings	-82.4	-7.49
21	San Jose Sharks	-37.6	-7.52
22	Arizona Coyotes	-68.4	-7.60
23	New York Rangers	-61.2	-7.65
24	Ottawa Senators	-47	-7.83
25	Buffalo Sabres	-47.1	-7.85
26	Pittsburgh Penguins	-40.3	-8.06
27	Winnipeg Jets	-40.3	-8.06
28	Boston Bruins	-40.4	-8.08
29	Tampa Bay Lightning	-57.1	-8.16
30	Los Angeles Kings	-79.8	-8.87
31	Edmonton Oilers	-56.2	-9.37

2020 Draft

The last one to analyze now as it’s only been four years and some players can take up to six years to get to the NHL. Plus there just hasn’t been much time for players to accumulate point shares, there won’t be a lot of variation. The best players taken here were Stutzle by Ottawa at 3, Lucas Raymond at 4 by Detroit, Seth Jarvis at 13 by Carolina, Lafreniere at 1 by the Rangers and Jake Sanderson by Ottawa at 5. Why isn’t Ottawa higher on the list when they have two of the five best players? Because they took those players around where they should have gone. And they’re only 2 points out of the top spot. There will be a lot of movement of these standings in the coming years.

Rank	Team	Missed Value	Missed Value per Pick
1	Boston Bruins	-17	-4.25
2	New York Islanders	-22.5	-4.50
3	Tampa Bay Lightning	-43.3	-4.81
4	New York Rangers	-43.5	-4.83
5	Pittsburgh Penguins	-26.3	-5.26
6	St. Louis Blues	-37	-5.29
7	Philadelphia Flyers	-26.8	-5.36
8	Buffalo Sabres	-27.1	-5.42
9	Florida Panthers	-50	-5.56
10	Arizona Coyotes	-28	-5.60
11	Vancouver Canucks	-28	-5.60
12	Montreal Canadiens	-45.1	-5.64
13	Chicago Blackhawks	-46.1	-5.76
14	Detroit Red Wings	-69.4	-5.78
15	Calgary Flames	-46.6	-5.83
16	Carolina Hurricanes	-46.7	-5.84
17	Toronto Maple Leafs	-70.2	-5.85
18	Vegas Golden Knights	-35.2	-5.87
19	Colorado Avalanche	-29.8	-5.96
20	Columbus Blue Jackets	-30.2	-6.04
21	Ottawa Senators	-63.6	-6.36
22	Edmonton Oilers	-38.2	-6.37
23	New Jersey Devils	-51.5	-6.44
24	Los Angeles Kings	-59.1	-6.57
25	Washington Capitals	-33.1	-6.62
26	Dallas Stars	-35	-7.00
27	Nashville Predators	-50.1	-7.16
28	San Jose Sharks	-65.1	-7.23
29	Winnipeg Jets	-32.9	-8.23
30	Anaheim Ducks	-66.6	-8.33
31	Minnesota Wild	-49.1	-9.82

The Don Sweeney Era

At some point, I’ll tie these to GMs and if I can find the names, to team Scouting Directors. But I think we’re also getting closer to answering questions about whether Don Sweeney is “the worst” at drafting, and over this period, if we average out the rankings, the Bruins are 12.83 or rounded to 13th best in the NHL from 2015 through 2020.

But again, a lot could change over the coming years.

Evaluating the Scouts

Some Bruins fans love to use their 20/20 hindsight and call out all the players the Bruins should have drafted. I’ve also wondered, what if the Bruins had just followed the NHL Central Scouting rankings for each draft, who would they have ended up with? Let’s take a look. Here’s the way it works, each year before the draft, the NHL puts out their own rankings of all the available players. I took that and I crossed names off as they were actually drafted and then when it was the Bruins’ turn to pick, looked at who is the best player available, according to the NHL scouts. Here’s how that went.

2015

We all know 2015 went really badly from the perspective that it was a very deep draft, there were a lot of good players available when the Bruins had three choices. Jake DeBrusk has turned out to be approximately what he was projected to be, around the 19th best player in that draft. Zach Senyshyn has been a huge miss, and then there’s Jakob Zboril. Due to slower development and injuries, the jury is still out. But those are the three guys they took. We always hear about Barzal, Connor, Chabot, Boeser and so many other players, but based on the 2015 NHL Central Scouting rankings, who would the Bruins have gotten? Yes, Matt Barzal and Kyle Connor, but the third one might surprise some people, Jakob Zboril. The best goalies available were Ilya Samsonov and Mackenzie Blackwood.

Let’s take it a little further and look at the second round where the Bruins took Brandon Carlo at 37 and Jakob Forsbacka-Karlsson at 45. The highest ranked players at 37 were Jansen Harkins, Michael Spacek, Blackwood or old friend Daniel Vladar. For the second pick, the same players were still available, but if the Bruins had taken Harkins at 37, then the next man up would be Filip Chlapik. Going as far as the third round, when they took Jeremy Lauzon, the best player in the rankings was Jeremy Roy.

2016

In 2016, the Bruins took Charlie McAvoy at 14, but according to the NHL Central Scouting, the highest rated available was Jakob Chychrun. Chrychrun is a pretty good player, but he’s not as good as Charlie McAvoy. That pick is a win for the Bruins. The Bruins also had a second first round pick at 29 where they took Trent Frederic. The highest ranked player was 21st, Alex Debrincat. He eventually went to Chicago, dropping all the way to 39. In the second round, the Bruins took a guy who is now an NHL defenseman, but was traded to the Rangers in the Rick Nash deal, Ryan Lindgren. He was drafted 49th. The highest ranked players at the time were Kale Clague and Carl Grundstrom. I feel pretty good about the Bruins scouting and drafting on that pick.

2017

This is the last year to look at as not enough players have had time to develop yet from 2018 on. But this year, the Bruins took Urho Vaakanainen at 18. The highest ranked players available according to the NHL Central Scouting were either Eeli Tolvanen or Klim Kostin. Meh. I’m not too excited about any of those players and I wouldn’t get too excited about “missing” on any of those. Looking into the second round, the Bruins took Jack Studnicka at 53 and the highest ranked players available for that pick were Rickard Hugg and Alexei Lipanov. To which I can just say “Who?” as neither of them have NHL experience and I don’t think either will ever get any.

There you have it, the answer to “What if the Bruins fired all their scouts and just used the NHL’s own rankings?” The thing to keep in mind though is for every Debrincat, all the other teams missed on him too. Each team has their own hits and misses including the Flyers, Stars and Capitals 2016 first round picks who have played a combined 15 NHL games.

Setting a Low Bar For Draft “Success”

All of the draft analysis so far has been about whether teams took the best player available at their draft position and if they did not, how much did they miss by. That is the main point of a draft, to get the best players available to you. However, some people like to criticize teams for only having a certain number of players reach the NHL. I see criticisms that include “Barely any of your draft picks make it to the NHL!” However, let’s look at this another way.

So one night, your favorite team plays the game and later that night, someone asks “How’d they do?” and you answer “They scored 3 goals.” Is that good? Virtually anyone would ask “But what was the score?” or “How many did the other team score?” because how many goals a team scores is relative to the other team’s goals scored in determining who wins. If you score 1 goal and shut out the other team, you win. If you score 6 goals but give up 7, you lose. So just having information about one team doesn’t tell you much. You need to compare it to the other team. Same with draft results. Knowing how one team has fared means nothing unless you know how that compares to other teams. If you want to know which team is best at drafting by the Best Player Available method, I have that for you here: Which Team is Best at Drafting: Answered

But if you care more about whether a team’s draft picks reach the NHL, I have that for you here too. It’s a ridiculously low bar to use “to reach the NHL”, but it’s a standard many people use in evaluating a General Manager or a team’s drafting ability, so here we go.

How it Works

I took the draft results (data taken from hockey-reference.com) from every NHL draft, 2000 to 2017 and added up how many players for each team have reached the NHL. There have been 4212 players drafted in that timeframe and 1963 of those have reached the NHL for a league average of 46.6%.

From 2000 to 2004, the NHL went 9 rounds for their draft, selecting around 290 players per year. The league averages those years were:

2000	40.27%
2001	43.94%
2002	35.75%
2003	44.52%
2004	44.33%

Yep 2002, a year led off with Rick Nash and Kari Lehtonen was a tough one. Once the league dropped two rounds, the percentage improved.

2005	48.26%
2006	42.72%
2007	45.97%
2008	49.54%
2009	55.02%
2010	50.24%
2011	59.81%
2012	51.42%
2013	50.71%
2014	46.67%
2015	48.57%
2016	45.50%
2017	42.40%

Some people ask why I stop at 2017 and you can see the answer here. Players just haven’t developed yet to give an accurate and fair picture. The percentage drops off. Maybe no more players from the 2017 draft will ever play in the NHL, but the numbers indicate otherwise. If we look at 2018, it’d likely be even lower, so it’s not worth including yet. (Update: Ok, I did check 2018. 217 players were selected and as of July 2022, 67 players have reached the NHL for a 30.8%. In 2018, there were also 217 selections and 56 have reached the NHL for a 25.8%. In short, it’s too early to judge teams on these drafts.)

Some years for individual teams were particularly interesting like in 2008, the Canadiens had 5 picks and zero have played in the NHL. Vancouver had 7 picks in 2007 and none have played even a single NHL game. The Penguins and Capitals matched that in 2017. Pittsburgh missing on six picks and the Capitals missed on all four. The opposite has also happened in a number of years. All five of the Devils picks in 2015 have played an NHL game. In 2011, the deepest draft statistically, four teams graduated all players to the NHL. All seven of Anaheim’s picks, all five of Calgary’s, all five of Pittsburgh’s and all six of Tampa’s. The highest graduation total was the 2008 Islanders, 9 out of their 13 picks played at least one NHL game.

The Best and Worst

Who are the best teams using this metric? This is the total percentage for all drafts from 2000 to 2017 for the teams. Atlanta and Winnipeg have been combined.

Boston	60.63%
Columbus	52.94%
Los Angeles	52.35%
Anaheim	52.34%
Toronto	51.45%
Ottawa	50.37%
Philadelphia	50.36%
New Jersey	50.00%
Pittsburgh	48.09%
San Jose	47.69%
St. Louis	46.90%
Carolina	46.88%
Buffalo	45.89%
Nashville	45.70%
Calgary	45.59%
Edmonton	45.45%
Colorado	45.39%
Florida	45.21%
Minnesota	45.11%
Montreal	45.04%
NY Islanders	45.00%
NY Rangers	44.44%
Dallas	43.88%
Washington	43.80%
Tampa Bay	42.48%
Atlanta/Winnipeg	41.89%
Phoenix/Arizona	41.73%
Chicago	41.57%
Vancouver	40.65%
Detroit	36.69%

So there you have it, the Boston Bruins and their General Managers from Mike O’Connell to Jeff Gorton to Peter Chiarelli to even the current Don Sweeney, lead the NHL with drafting players who play at least one game in the NHL. Again, a ridiculously low bar, but it’s one that people choose for some reason, when they want to evaluate a team’s drafting ability and the front office.

If you have any questions about the data, let me know on twitter at @plaverty24 and I’ll do my best to answer.

2017 Draft: Five Years Later

The quality of a draft is constantly changing, as the players’ value, or their “Point Shares (PS)” number changes when they play. The result of a draft isn’t really finalized until all the players have retired. On the other end of the spectrum, players can’t earn PS until they’re playing in the NHL. Evaluate these too soon, and it’ll be a very top-heavy draft as those players generally get to the NHL the fastest. For this reason, I waited until the end of the ’21-’22 season to put together the results of the 2017 draft. Here’s what we got so far.

A reminder of the methodology for this is here: “How This Works.”

First, here’s the 2017 first round:

1	New Jersey Devils	Nico Hischier
2	Philadelphia Flyers	Nolan Patrick
3	Dallas Stars	Miro Heiskanen
4	Colorado Avalanche	Cale Makar
5	Vancouver Canucks	Elias Pettersson
6	Vegas Golden Knights	Cody Glass
7	New York Rangers	Lias Andersson
8	Buffalo Sabres	Casey Mittelstadt
9	Detroit Red Wings	Michael Rasmussen
10	Florida Panthers	Owen Tippett
11	Los Angeles Kings	Gabriel Vilardi
12	Carolina Hurricanes	Martin Necas
13	Vegas Golden Knights	Nick Suzuki
14	Tampa Bay Lightning	Callan Foote
15	Vegas Golden Knights	Erik Brannstrom
16	Calgary Flames	Juuso Valimaki
17	Toronto Maple Leafs	Timothy Liljegren
18	Boston Bruins	Urho Vaakanainen
19	San Jose Sharks	Joshua Norris
20	St. Louis Blues	Robert Thomas
21	New York Rangers	Filip Chytil
22	Edmonton Oilers	Kailer Yamamoto
23	Arizona Coyotes	Pierre-Olivier Joseph
24	Winnipeg Jets	Kristian Vesalainen
25	Montreal Canadiens	Ryan Poehling
26	Dallas Stars	Jake Oettinger
27	Philadelphia Flyers	Morgan Frost
28	Ottawa Senators	Shane Bowers
29	Chicago Blackhawks	Henri Jokiharju
30	Nashville Predators	Eeli Tolvanen
31	St. Louis Blues	Klim Kostin

Next, here are the top 31 players, based on their NHL “Point Shares”:

Draft Position	Draft Team	Player	Point Share
4	Colorado Avalanche	Cale Makar	30.2
3	Dallas Stars	Miro Heiskanen	25.5
5	Vancouver Canucks	Elias Pettersson	25.4
1	New Jersey Devils	Nico Hischier	19.8
39	Dallas Stars	Jason Robertson	15.7
20	St. Louis Blues	Robert Thomas	14.9
26	Dallas Stars	Jake Oettinger	12.7
12	Carolina Hurricanes	Martin Necas	12.1
13	Vegas Golden Knights	Nick Suzuki	11.3
19	San Jose Sharks	Joshua Norris	10.3
111	Boston Bruins	Jeremy Swayman	9.5
121	Ottawa Senators	Drake Batherson	9
22	Edmonton Oilers	Kailer Yamamoto	8.7
34	Vegas Golden Knights	Nicolas Hague	8.6
29	Chicago Blackhawks	Henri Jokiharju	8.2
49	San Jose Sharks	Mario Ferraro	7.7
21	New York Rangers	Filip Chytil	6.7
50	Anaheim Ducks	Maxime Comtois	6.2
103	Los Angeles Kings	Michael Anderson	6.2
8	Buffalo Sabres	Casey Mittelstadt	5.5
2	Philadelphia Flyers	Nolan Patrick	4.1
99	Buffalo Sabres	Jacob Bryson	4.1
17	Toronto Maple Leafs	Timothy Liljegren	4
45	Columbus Blue Jackets	Alexandre Texier	4
15	Vegas Golden Knights	Erik Brannstrom	3.8
30	Nashville Predators	Eeli Tolvanen	3.7
14	Tampa Bay Lightning	Callan Foote	3.6
47	Ottawa Senators	Alex Formenton	3.5
11	Los Angeles Kings	Gabriel Vilardi	3.4
117	Columbus Blue Jackets	Emil Bemstrom	3.1
9	Detroit Red Wings	Michael Rasmussen	2.8

Next, we look at which teams had the best draft. As explained in the methodology, for the table below, a team wants fewer points. If the team drafted the best player available in their draft position, that earns a 0. If the best player is not taken, the team gets points added for the difference in PS between the player taken and the best player available. So fewer points are better.

Team	Total PS	# Picks
Washington Capitals	11.2	4
San Jose Sharks	17.4	6
New York Islanders	19.5	5
Dallas Stars	20.1	7
Pittsburgh Penguins	22.3	6
Ottawa Senators	22.8	4
Columbus Blue Jackets	23.1	7
Calgary Flames	23.4	5
Anaheim Ducks	25.7	5
Boston Bruins	26.2	6
St. Louis Blues	28.7	6
Minnesota Wild	30.3	6
New York Rangers	30.7	7
Tampa Bay Lightning	32.1	6
Nashville Predators	32.9	6
Edmonton Oilers	35	7
Toronto Maple Leafs	35.2	7
Florida Panthers	35.5	5
Colorado Avalanche	37.4	7
Los Angeles Kings	47.7	7
Winnipeg Jets	48.2	8
Buffalo Sabres	48.8	6
Vancouver Canucks	48.9	8
Carolina Hurricanes	50	8
Montreal Canadiens	53.5	7
Chicago Blackhawks	55.2	9
New Jersey Devils	57.3	11
Arizona Coyotes	67.7	9
Vegas Golden Knights	72.6	12
Detroit Red Wings	79.5	11
Philadelphia Flyers	87.2	9

A team can get a better score in the table above, simply by having fewer picks. To adjust for that, here’s the average points per draft pick.

Team	Average PS	# Picks
Washington Capitals	2.80	4
Dallas Stars	2.87	7
San Jose Sharks	2.90	6
Columbus Blue Jackets	3.30	7
Pittsburgh Penguins	3.72	6
New York Islanders	3.90	5
Boston Bruins	4.37	6
New York Rangers	4.39	7
Calgary Flames	4.68	5
St. Louis Blues	4.78	6
Edmonton Oilers	5.00	7
Toronto Maple Leafs	5.03	7
Minnesota Wild	5.05	6
Anaheim Ducks	5.14	5
New Jersey Devils	5.21	11
Colorado Avalanche	5.34	7
Tampa Bay Lightning	5.35	6
Nashville Predators	5.48	6
Ottawa Senators	5.70	4
Winnipeg Jets	6.03	8
Vegas Golden Knights	6.05	12
Vancouver Canucks	6.11	8
Chicago Blackhawks	6.13	9
Carolina Hurricanes	6.25	8
Los Angeles Kings	6.81	7
Florida Panthers	7.10	5
Detroit Red Wings	7.23	11
Arizona Coyotes	7.52	9
Montreal Canadiens	7.64	7
Buffalo Sabres	8.13	6
Philadelphia Flyers	9.69	9

The numbers are a little misleading and we need to look into details. Both tables indicate the Capitals had the best draft, when actually, they’ve had zero players make it to the NHL. That is in part due to the fact that they only had four picks and their first pick was 120th overall. The remainder of their picks were 151, 182 and 213. Not many teams will hit on those.

Dallas on the other hand, had an outstanding draft. They drafted three of the top seven players getting the second-best player, Miro Heiskenen at 3 (25.5 PS), the fifth best player, Jason Robertson at 39 (15.7 PS) and the seventh best player, Jake Oettinger at 27 (12.7 PS). The Sharks grabbed 10th best Josh Norris at 19 and he’s at 10.3 PS and 16th best Mario Ferraro at 49 and 7.7 PS.

The Don Sweeney haters will be disappointed to see the Bruins had the 7th best draft, which was on the strength of the current 11th best player, Jeremy Swayman taken at 111, and his 9.5 PS. First rounder, Urho Vaakanainen was the 43rd best player in the draft so far, with his 1.3 PS score.

NHL Draft Analysis

Using Data to Analyze NHL Drafts